Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ashtian Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ashtian, Iran
Abstract: (94 Views)
Abstract Background: Rumination, as a transdiagnostic cognitive process, plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of post-traumatic distress, particularly in the context of marital infidelity a profound relational rupture that frequently precipitates enduring emotional and cognitive dysregulation in women. Despite its clinical relevance, comparative evidence on the relative efficacy of cognitive-based interventions in ameliorating post-infidelity rumination remains scarce. Method: This quasi-experimental study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Schema Therapy (ST) and Cognitive Restructuring Therapy (CRT) in reducing maladaptive rumination among women exposed to spousal infidelity. Seventy-five participants were randomly assigned to three conditions: ST (n = 25), CRT (n = 25), and a no-treatment control group (n = 25). Rumination was assessed using the Interpersonal Distress Rumination Questionnaire at two time points pre-intervention and following an 8-week treatment period. Results: Findings revealed that both ST and CRT significantly reduced rumination levels (p < .001). Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant Time × Group interaction [F(2, 72) = 18.46, p < .001], indicating differential treatment efficacy across groups. Post hoc analyses (Tukey HSD) further confirmed that ST yielded significantly greater reductions in rumination compared to CRT (p = .014) and the control condition (p < .001). Conclusion:Schema Therapy, with its deep focus on early maladaptive schemas, demonstrates superior clinical efficacy in reducing trauma-induced rumination associated with betrayal-related experiences.
Farzalizadeh V, Askarian M, Azadyekta M. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Schema Therapy and Cognitive Restructuring Therapy on Rumination in Women Victimized by Marital Infidelity. NPWJM 2026; 13 (49) : 02 URL: http://npwjm.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-1084-en.html